They're Serious About Clean Streets

Today is a day off from work, so before I walked the dog I moved my car from in front of the house to the other side of Broad Street so that the street sweeper can proceed unimpeded and I don't get a , as there are laws in place designed to guarantee the sweeper a clear path to perform it's function.

While out with the dog, I noticed that the sweeper was out on Broad Street promptly at 9 a.m., when the parking restriction begins. I also noticed that some cars had yet to move.

On the way back home, the white car in the above picture was preparing to pull away (after the sweeper had passed) when Officer Ed Cross pulled his cruiser up behind it, wrote the ticket and handed it to the driver.

The sweeper, whose operator could have alerted the officer to the vehicle's presence, continued his route in the area.

I appreciate it that local government is serious enough about maintaining the physical character of its residential streets that it owns a sweeper, employs someone to operate it, and assures through ordinance and enforcement that the streets can be cleaned to some acceptable standard.

As I walked home, the sweeper kept to his route, the officer returned to patrol, and I finished walking the dog, stopping only to clean up after her and at least two other dogs whose owners had permitted them to defecate in our yard, and left it for someone else to clean.

There is an ordinance prohibiting this, but I don't know if are manned, ready, or willing to swoop in on a dog owner whose charge has just left a deposit on someone else's property like they did with the vehicle blocking the street sweeper. There are places that have taken enforcement of this problem to what is arguably an extreme, but that's for another post.

It would be nice if some citizens were as diligent in cleaning up after their animals as the borough is in keeping the streets clean. Thanks, .

Enjoy the day.